undamentalytics Newsletter

Acco Brands vs Millerknoll

Millerknoll is the larger business, with $3.84bn of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $1.52bn for Acco Brands (2.5 times as much). Millerknoll grew faster (4.7% against -8.5%). Acco Brands kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 2.7% against 2.4%. Millerknoll carries less debt relative to equity (96.4% against 126.5%).

Latest fiscal yearAcco BrandsACCO, 2025MillerknollMLKN, 2026
Revenue $1.52bn $3.84bn
Revenue growth -8.5% 4.7%
Net income $41.3m $91.5m
Operating margin 6.1% 5.2%
Net margin 2.7% 2.4%
Return on equity 6.5% 7.0%
Free cash flow $68.7m $77.6m
Cash $64.4m $168m
Total debt $841m $1.29bn
Debt to equity 126.5% 96.4%
Dividend per share $0.30 $0.75
Dividend yield 5.5% 3.3%
Share buybacks $15.1m —
Employees 4,700 10,544
Market value $480m $1.48bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Within our value range
Moat score 47 (Moderate) 43 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 1 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.