undamentalytics Newsletter

Brinks vs Thomson Reuters

Thomson Reuters is the larger business, with $7.48bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $5.26bn for Brinks (1.4 times as much). Brinks grew faster (5.0% against 3.0%). Thomson Reuters kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 20.1% against 3.8%. Thomson Reuters carries less debt relative to equity (17.8% against 1604.4%).

Latest fiscal yearBrinksBCO, 2025Thomson ReutersTRI, 2025
Revenue $5.26bn $7.48bn
Revenue growth 5.0% 3.0%
Net income $200m $1.50bn
Operating margin 11.1% 28.5%
Net margin 3.8% 20.1%
Return on equity 86.3% 12.6%
Free cash flow $436m $2.02bn
Cash $1.73bn $511m
Total debt $4.46bn $2.12bn
Debt to equity 1604.4% 17.8%
Dividend per share $1.01 —
Dividend yield 0.9% —
Share buybacks $209m $1.00bn
Employees — —
Market value $4.42bn $54.95bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Above our value range
Moat score 46 (Moderate) —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 1 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.