undamentalytics Newsletter

BEL Fuse vs CTS

BEL Fuse is the larger business, with $675m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $541m for CTS (1.2 times as much). BEL Fuse grew faster (26.3% against 5.2%). CTS kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 12.1% against 9.1%. CTS carries less debt relative to equity (10.4% against 46.4%).

Latest fiscal yearBEL FuseBELFA, 2025CTSCTS, 2025
Revenue $675m $541m
Revenue growth 26.3% 5.2%
Net income $61.5m $65.3m
Operating margin 16.4% 15.3%
Net margin 9.1% 12.1%
Return on equity 15.7% 12.1%
Free cash flow $68.6m $86.4m
Cash $57.8m $82.3m
Total debt $198m $57.5m
Debt to equity 46.4% 10.4%
Dividend per share — $0.16
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.3%
Share buybacks $0 $56.2m
Employees — —
Market value $408m $1.81bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Within our value range
Moat score 30 (Weak) 76 (Strong)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.