undamentalytics Newsletter

Bruker vs Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories is the larger business, with $4.02bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.44bn for Bruker (1.2 times as much). Bruker grew faster (2.1% against -0.9%). Bruker kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -0.3% against -3.6%. Charles River Laboratories carries less debt relative to equity (67.6% against 76.1%).

Latest fiscal yearBrukerBRKR, 2025Charles River LaboratoriesCRL, 2025
Revenue $3.44bn $4.02bn
Revenue growth 2.1% -0.9%
Net income −$8.6m −$144m
Operating margin 2.0% 0.6%
Net margin -0.3% -3.6%
Return on equity -0.4% -4.4%
Free cash flow $43.3m $518m
Cash $299m $214m
Total debt $1.87bn $2.14bn
Debt to equity 76.1% 67.6%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield 0.3% —
Share buybacks $10.0m $361m
Employees 11,085 19,700
Market value $8.56bn $16.81bn
Price vs our value range Above our value range Above our value range
Moat score 66 (Moderate) 60 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 16 sales 2 buys, 21 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.