undamentalytics Newsletter

Bruker vs Medpace Holdings

Bruker is the larger business, with $3.44bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.53bn for Medpace Holdings (1.4 times as much). Medpace Holdings grew faster (20.0% against 2.1%). Medpace Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 17.8% against -0.3%. Medpace Holdings carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 76.1%).

Latest fiscal yearBrukerBRKR, 2025Medpace HoldingsMEDP, 2025
Revenue $3.44bn $2.53bn
Revenue growth 2.1% 20.0%
Net income −$8.6m $451m
Operating margin 2.0% 21.1%
Net margin -0.3% 17.8%
Return on equity -0.4% 70.2%
Free cash flow $43.3m $682m
Cash $299m $497m
Total debt $1.87bn $0
Debt to equity 76.1% 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield 0.3% —
Share buybacks $10.0m $917m
Employees 11,085 6,200
Market value $8.56bn $18.66bn
Price vs our value range Above our value range Below our value range
Moat score 66 (Moderate) 89 (Strong)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 16 sales 0 buys, 56 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.