undamentalytics Newsletter

Medpace Holdings vs Qiagen

Medpace Holdings is the larger business, with $2.53bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.09bn for Qiagen (1.2 times as much). Medpace Holdings grew faster (20.0% against 5.7%). Qiagen kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 20.3% against 17.8%. Medpace Holdings carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 43.8%).

Latest fiscal yearMedpace HoldingsMEDP, 2025QiagenQGEN, 2025
Revenue $2.53bn $2.09bn
Revenue growth 20.0% 5.7%
Net income $451m $425m
Operating margin 21.1% 22.3%
Net margin 17.8% 20.3%
Return on equity 70.2% 11.6%
Free cash flow $682m $453m
Cash $497m $839m
Total debt $0 $1.65bn
Debt to equity 0.0% 43.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — 0.5%
Share buybacks $917m $280m
Employees 6,200 —
Market value $18.66bn $11.03bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Above our value range
Moat score 89 (Strong) 58 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 56 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.