undamentalytics Newsletter

Creative Medical Technology Holdings vs Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell Immunopharma is the larger business, with $36,000 of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $6,000 for Creative Medical Technology Holdings (6.0 times as much). Lyell Immunopharma grew faster (-41.0% against -45.5%). Creative Medical Technology Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -99916.8% against -762355.6%. Creative Medical Technology Holdings carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 0.0%).

Latest fiscal yearCreative Medical Technology HoldingsCELZ, 2025Lyell ImmunopharmaLYEL, 2025
Revenue $6,000 $36,000
Revenue growth -45.5% -41.0%
Net income −$6.0m −$274m
Operating margin -102380.2% -748344.4%
Net margin -99916.8% -762355.6%
Return on equity -86.5% -87.0%
Free cash flow — −$151m
Cash $7.2m $60.2m
Total debt $0 $0
Debt to equity 0.0% 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks $10,000 —
Employees — 161
Market value $4.3m $252m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 35 (Weak) 12 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 2 buys, 29 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.