Fossil Group vs Oxford Industries
Oxford Industries is the larger business, with $1.48bn of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $1.00bn for Fossil Group (1.5 times as much). Oxford Industries grew faster (-2.6% against -12.3%). Oxford Industries kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -1.9% against -7.8%. Oxford Industries carries less debt relative to equity (22.6% against 199.4%).
| Latest fiscal year | Fossil GroupFOSL, 2025 | Oxford IndustriesOXM, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.00bn | $1.48bn |
| Revenue growth | -12.3% | -2.6% |
| Net income | −$78.3m | −$27.9m |
| Operating margin | -1.9% | -2.1% |
| Net margin | -7.8% | -1.9% |
| Return on equity | -62.3% | -4.9% |
| Free cash flow | −$60.5m | $11.3m |
| Cash | $95.8m | $8.1m |
| Total debt | $205m | $116m |
| Debt to equity | 199.4% | 22.6% |
| Dividend per share | — | $2.76 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.9% |
| Share buybacks | $164,000 | $55.2m |
| Employees | 4,500 | — |
| Market value | $395m | $419m |
| Price vs our value range | Above our value range | Below our value range |
| Moat score | 50 (Moderate) | 66 (Moderate) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 12 buys, 1 sales | 5 buys, 0 sales |