undamentalytics Newsletter

Ferroglobe vs Centrus Energy

Ferroglobe is the larger business, with $1.34bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $449m for Centrus Energy (3.0 times as much). Centrus Energy grew faster (1.5% against -18.8%). Centrus Energy kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 17.3% against -12.8%. Ferroglobe carries less debt relative to equity (23.5% against 157.8%).

Latest fiscal yearFerroglobeGSM, 2025Centrus EnergyLEU, 2025
Revenue $1.34bn $449m
Revenue growth -18.8% 1.5%
Net income −$171m $77.8m
Operating margin -10.0% 11.2%
Net margin -12.8% 17.3%
Return on equity -25.9% 16.8%
Free cash flow −$10.2m $31.3m
Cash $123m $1.96bn
Total debt $140m $1.21bn
Debt to equity 23.5% 157.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield 1.4% —
Share buybacks $4.7m —
Employees — —
Market value $724m $2.09bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Above our value range
Moat score — 23 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 2 buys, 1 sales 0 buys, 1 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.