Compass Minerals International vs Ferroglobe
Compass Minerals International and Ferroglobe are similar in size: $1.24bn and $1.34bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Compass Minerals International grew faster (11.3% against -18.8%). Compass Minerals International kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -6.4% against -12.8%. Ferroglobe carries less debt relative to equity (23.5% against 362.1%).
| Latest fiscal year | Compass Minerals InternationalCMP, 2025 | FerroglobeGSM, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.24bn | $1.34bn |
| Revenue growth | 11.3% | -18.8% |
| Net income | −$79.8m | −$171m |
| Operating margin | 2.0% | -10.0% |
| Net margin | -6.4% | -12.8% |
| Return on equity | -29.0% | -25.9% |
| Free cash flow | $128m | −$10.2m |
| Cash | $59.7m | $123m |
| Total debt | $848m | $140m |
| Debt to equity | 362.1% | 23.5% |
| Dividend per share | — | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Share buybacks | — | $4.7m |
| Employees | 1,849 | — |
| Market value | $980m | $723m |
| Price vs our value range | Above our value range | Within our value range |
| Moat score | 33 (Weak) | — |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 0 sales | 2 buys, 1 sales |