undamentalytics Newsletter

Nano-x Imaging vs Inspiremd

Nano-x Imaging is the larger business, with $13.0m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $9.0m for Inspiremd (1.5 times as much). Inspiremd grew faster (28.1% against 15.4%). Inspiremd kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -543.3% against -576.1%. Inspiremd carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 2.4%).

Latest fiscal yearNano-x ImagingNNOX, 2025InspiremdNSPR, 2025
Revenue $13.0m $9.0m
Revenue growth 15.4% 28.1%
Net income −$75.0m −$48.8m
Operating margin -600.8% -552.6%
Net margin -576.1% -543.3%
Return on equity -45.6% -106.9%
Free cash flow −$45.0m −$36.8m
Cash $49.2m $8.9m
Total debt $3.3m $0
Debt to equity 2.4% 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — 127
Market value $20.4m $29.7m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — 18 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 10 buys, 2 sales 18 buys, 12 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.