undamentalytics Newsletter

Puma Biotechnology vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

Puma Biotechnology is the larger business, with $228m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $190m for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals (1.2 times as much). Rhythm Pharmaceuticals grew faster (45.8% against -0.9%). Puma Biotechnology kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 13.6% against -103.6%. Puma Biotechnology carries less debt relative to equity (17.4% against 77.8%).

Latest fiscal yearPuma BiotechnologyPBYI, 2025Rhythm PharmaceuticalsRYTM, 2025
Revenue $228m $190m
Revenue growth -0.9% 45.8%
Net income $31.1m −$197m
Operating margin 16.3% -101.2%
Net margin 13.6% -103.6%
Return on equity 28.0% —
Free cash flow $41.7m −$117m
Cash $29.6m $54.3m
Total debt $22.7m $108m
Debt to equity 17.4% 77.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees 179 414
Market value $520m $6.43bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range —
Moat score 47 (Moderate) 25 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 17 sales 0 buys, 50 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.