Middlesex Water Co: what the price is pricing in

The price implies cash-flow growth of 22.7% a year; our model expects 6.2%. That gap is wide enough for a short position this quarter. Switch lens below to see the same question asked of earnings, growth, sales and book value.

No published rating for Middlesex Water Co: held for review: after-tax interest is 61% of the cash flow left for shareholders; our flat discount rate doesn't yet reflect debt this heavy. The readings below run our models backwards for research and show how trading the gap would have done; they are not a valuation or a rating. The valuation page shows the models and their status.

What growth in cash flow is the price paying for?

The price implies cash-flow growth of 22.7% a year; our model expects 6.2%.

Market more optimistic than our model: short this quarter

What the price implies What our model expects

Quarters with a position40 long, 4 short, since September 30, 2025

Beat the S&P 5003 of 475.0% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+14.3%cumulative; worst fall -8.3%

$10,000 became$13,013S&P 500 bought and held: $11,572

Over time

The growth in owner earnings (free cash flow after stock-based pay) that would justify the share price in our discounted-cash-flow model, against the growth the model itself assumes from the company's record.

Growth our model assumes Growth the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

StrategyS&P 500, buy and hold Hypothetical, before costs. The strategy holds the S&P 500 and only changes on a signal: it switches into MSEX in long quarters and adds a short of MSEX in short quarters. The gap between the lines is what the signal added or lost.

Skill or luck?

In plain English: With only 4 quarters of positions, Middlesex Water Co's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
Shorts	4	75.0%	+3.6%	+7.0%	+14.3%	0.91	Too few quarters
All positions	4	75.0%	+3.6%	+7.0%	+14.3%	0.91	Too few quarters

Each position is measured against the S&P 500 over the same quarter: a long earns the stock's return minus the index's, a short the index's minus the stock's. "A year" compounds the per-quarter results. Evidence: strong at a t-statistic of 2 or more, some from 1.5; "worse" when the result is that far below zero; one company's history is a small sample, so read these alongside the results across all companies.

Every quarter (5)

From	Price paid	Growth the price implies	Growth our model assumes	Position	MSEX	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$52.97	22.7%	6.2%	Short	+9.3%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$56.16	28.3%	4.2%	Short	−5.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$52.05	73.0%	3.9%	Short	+8.7%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$50.42	79.5%	6.8%	Short	+3.9%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$54.12	96.6%	10.6%	Short	−6.2%	+2.7%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

What growth in earnings is the price paying for?

The price implies earnings growth of 5.8% a year; our model expects 6.2%.

Gap too narrow for a position this quarter

What the price implies What our model expects

Quarters with a position00 long, 0 short, since March 31, 2024

Beat the S&P 500—no position yet

Strategy against the index0.0%cumulative; worst fall 0.0%

$10,000 became$15,011S&P 500 bought and held: $15,011

Over time

The earnings growth the price-to-earnings ratio requires, against the growth our model assumes. Net income is already after interest, so it is valued at the return shareholders require, plus spare cash (none for banks and insurers, whose cash is funded by deposits and policies), with no debt subtracted.

Growth our model assumes Growth the P/E implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

Skill or luck?

In plain English: The gap has not been wide enough for a position in Middlesex Water Co since 2010, so there is no record to judge.

Positions	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	—	—	—	—	—	—
Shorts	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	—	—	—	—	—	—

Every quarter (11)

From	Price paid	Growth the P/E implies	Growth our model assumes	Position	MSEX	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$52.97	5.8%	6.2%	No position	+9.3%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$56.16	8.2%	4.2%	No position	−5.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$52.05	7.2%	3.9%	No position	+8.7%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$50.42	6.3%	6.8%	No position	+3.9%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$54.12	7.2%	10.6%	No position	−6.2%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$54.18	7.3%	13.0%	No position	+0.5%	+8.1%
March 31, 2025	$64.10	9.8%	12.8%	No position	−14.9%	+10.8%
December 31, 2024	$52.63	7.5%	9.3%	No position	+22.6%	−4.3%
September 30, 2024	$65.24	13.3%	5.6%	No position	−18.9%	+2.5%
June 30, 2024	$52.26	9.7%	4.2%	No position	+25.5%	+5.8%
March 31, 2024	$52.50	12.3%	3.9%	No position	+0.1%	+4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

What profit margin is the price paying for?

The price implies an owner-earnings margin of 32.0%; the company has kept 12.9%.

Market more optimistic than our model: short this quarter

What the price implies What the company delivered

Quarters with a position100 long, 10 short, since March 31, 2024

Beat the S&P 5007 of 1070.0% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+14.8%cumulative; worst fall -28.8%

$10,000 became$16,382S&P 500 bought and held: $15,011

Over time

The owner-earnings margin (free cash flow after stock pay, as a share of revenue) the price requires at our model's growth, against the margin the company has delivered over three years.

Margin delivered Margin the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

Skill or luck?

In plain English: Across 10 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 7, by +2.7% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
Shorts	10	70.0%	+2.7%	+7.0%	+5.7%	0.51	No reliable evidence
All positions	10	70.0%	+2.7%	+7.0%	+5.7%	0.51	No reliable evidence

Every quarter (11)

From	Price paid	Margin the price implies	Margin delivered	Position	MSEX	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$52.97	32.0%	12.9%	Short	+9.3%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$56.16	39.2%	10.5%	Short	−5.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$52.05	38.2%	1.3%	Short	+8.7%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$50.42	31.2%	0.9%	Short	+3.9%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$54.12	34.3%	0.7%	Short	−6.2%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$54.18	18.1%	-2.1%	Short	+0.5%	+8.1%
March 31, 2025	$64.10	28.0%	-11.5%	Short	−14.9%	+10.8%
December 31, 2024	$52.63	23.2%	-11.9%	Short	+22.6%	−4.3%
September 30, 2024	$65.24	36.3%	-14.5%	Short	−18.9%	+2.5%
June 30, 2024	$52.26	33.7%	-18.3%	Short	+25.5%	+5.8%
March 31, 2024	$52.50	46.9%	-20.1%	Short	+0.1%	+4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

What return on equity is the price paying for?

The price implies a return on equity of 13.9%; the company earned 9.8%.

Gap too narrow for a position this quarter

What the price implies What the company delivered

Quarters with a position90 long, 9 short, since March 31, 2024

Beat the S&P 5007 of 977.8% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+25.2%cumulative; worst fall -28.8%

$10,000 became$17,935S&P 500 bought and held: $15,011

Over time

The return on equity that justifies the price-to-book ratio, (P/B)(r − g) + g with an 8.5% required return and 2.5% long-run growth, against the return the company delivered last year.

Return on equity delivered Return on equity the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

Skill or luck?

In plain English: Across 9 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 7, by +3.9% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
Shorts	9	77.8%	+3.9%	+7.5%	+10.5%	0.68	No reliable evidence
All positions	9	77.8%	+3.9%	+7.5%	+10.5%	0.68	No reliable evidence

Every quarter (11)

From	Price paid	Return on equity the price implies	Return on equity delivered	Position	MSEX	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$52.97	13.9%	9.8%	No position	+9.3%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$56.16	15.0%	9.3%	Short	−5.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$52.05	14.2%	9.1%	Short	+8.7%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$50.42	13.9%	9.3%	No position	+3.9%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$54.12	15.3%	9.7%	Short	−6.2%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$54.18	15.5%	9.8%	Short	+0.5%	+8.1%
March 31, 2025	$64.10	18.0%	10.2%	Short	−14.9%	+10.8%
December 31, 2024	$52.63	15.3%	9.6%	Short	+22.6%	−4.3%
September 30, 2024	$65.24	18.7%	8.8%	Short	−18.9%	+2.5%
June 30, 2024	$52.26	15.7%	8.8%	Short	+25.5%	+5.8%
March 31, 2024	$52.50	15.8%	7.7%	Short	+0.1%	+4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

How the test works

At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Middlesex Water Co's quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.

Compare with peers

Head to head: ARTNA vs MSEX MSEX vs YORW AWR vs MSEX

More: Water Utilities stocks compared, Utilities sector, rankings of US companies

Figures from Middlesex Water Co's SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q), retrieved October 30, 2026. How we read and check them: methodology and data sources. Not investment advice. Back to Middlesex Water Co.