Neogenomics Inc key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Neogenomics Inc had return on equity of -12.4% and a net margin of -14.9%. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2016Dec 2016 | 2017Dec 2017 | 2018Dec 2018 | 2019Dec 2019 | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMSept 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | −2.6% | −0.2% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 0.9% | −1.7% | −28.3% | −14.9% | −11.9% | −14.9% | −4.1% |
| Return on equity | −3.8% | −0.2% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 0.7% | −0.9% | −13.7% | −9.1% | −8.5% | −12.4% | −3.9% |
| Return on assets | −1.8% | −0.1% | 0.6% | 1.3% | 0.5% | −0.6% | −8.0% | −5.1% | −4.7% | −7.2% | −2.4% |
| Effective tax rate | — | — | 31.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D as % of revenue | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 4.5% | 5.9% | 4.6% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 5.0% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $410m of assets due within a year against $116m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $410m short-term assets against $460m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $139m of cash against $375m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 47% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 50% to 47% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt $4m of operating cash flow against $375m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of −$49m against $3m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Neogenomics's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 10 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Cash operating profit has been a median -3.6% of total assets over 10 years.
- Pricing power 14 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 43.5%, moving by 3.4 percentage points (standard deviation) across 9 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -14.3%; its worst year was -34.8%.
- Cash conversion 2 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 2 of 9 years, at a median -3.6% of revenue.
- Discipline 13 / 20
The diluted share count rose 6.5% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 3.1% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (39 before it).
Compare with peers
- Repligen Corp statistics
- 10x Genomics, Inc. statistics
- Azenta, Inc. statistics
- Veracyte, Inc. statistics
- Bio-Techne statistics
Head to head: NEO vs RGENNEO vs TXGAZTA vs NEONEO vs TECH
More: Life Sciences Tools & Services stocks compared, Health Care sector, rankings of US companies