CL Workshop Group Ltd key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, CL Workshop Group Ltd had return on equity of -90.9%, a net margin of -40.2%, debt equal to 149.1% of equity and a current ratio of 1.31. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 34.4% | 36.0% | 40.5% | 33.3% | 9.6% |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 8.6% | −67.5% | −53.4% | −40.2% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | 1.5% | 8.4% | −1.4% | 14.2% | −6.6% |
| Return on equity | 16.6% | 46.6% | −77.8% | −64.0% | −90.9% |
| Return on assets | — | 7.0% | −19.5% | −18.4% | −21.2% |
| Asset turnover | — | 0.81 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.53 |
| Current ratio | — | 1.04 | 1.28 | 1.11 | 1.31 |
| Debt to equity | 0.0% | 102.8% | 70.5% | 113.7% | 149.1% |
| Effective tax rate | 32.0% | 8.3% | — | — | — |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | 5.3% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Free cash flow ÷ net income | 53.9% | 97.7% | — | — | — |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $14m of assets due within a year against $11m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $14m short-term assets against $53,720 of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt Cash or debt not separately reported. Not assessable.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Equity or debt not reported. Not assessable.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Five-year comparison not available. Not assessable.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt Cash flow or debt not reported. Not assessable.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Interest not separately reported. Not assessable.
Moat
Not assessed: fewer than five years of comparable figures in the filings. AI disruption exposure for this industry: Medium.
Compare with peers
Head to head: LPX vs NWGLNWGL vs WFGBCC vs NWGL
More: Forest Products stocks compared, Materials sector, rankings of US companies