Neuronetics, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Neuronetics, Inc. had return on equity of -155.7%, an operating margin of -21.1%, debt equal to 312.8% of equity and a current ratio of 2.02. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2016Dec 2016 | 2017Dec 2017 | 2018Dec 2018 | 2019Dec 2019 | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 80.7% | 76.2% | 76.4% | 75.4% | 76.5% | 78.9% | 76.3% | 72.5% | 72.3% | 48.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | −27.3% | −33.7% | −37.6% | −43.0% | −45.3% | −49.8% | −53.8% | −42.8% | −46.2% | −21.1% | −14.7% |
| Net margin | −32.8% | −39.7% | −45.7% | −46.4% | −55.7% | −56.4% | −57.0% | −42.3% | −58.4% | −26.1% | −19.6% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | −25.9% | −29.0% | −40.9% | −49.9% | −59.1% | −54.8% | −52.2% | −48.2% | −43.3% | −14.2% | −7.3% |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | −48.9% | −74.9% | −56.4% | −52.3% | −66.2% | −141.2% | −155.7% | −151.3% |
| Return on assets | — | −41.2% | −30.9% | −26.7% | −30.7% | −28.4% | −28.8% | −25.9% | −34.0% | −27.6% | −22.3% |
| Asset turnover | — | 1.04 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 1.06 | 1.14 |
| Current ratio | — | 3.09 | 8.44 | 3.19 | 4.75 | 7.34 | 2.98 | 4.73 | 1.86 | 2.02 | 1.88 |
| Debt to equity | — | — | 42.8% | 65.1% | 137.3% | 41.5% | 63.0% | 175.5% | 216.6% | 312.8% | 364.1% |
| Interest cover (operating income ÷ interest) | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m |
| R&D as % of revenue | 24.0% | 19.6% | 15.6% | 21.9% | 18.7% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 13.3% | 17.1% | 4.4% | 3.8% |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 4.3% | 5.0% | 3.3% | 2.0% | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Quarter | 2024 Q3Sept 2024 | 2024 Q4Dec 2024 | 2025 Q1Mar 2025 | 2025 Q2Jun 2025 | 2025 Q3Sept 2025 | 2025 Q4Dec 2025 | 2026 Q1Mar 2026 | 2026 Q2Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.6% | 66.2% | 49.2% | 46.6% | 45.9% | 52.0% | 46.9% | 51.1% |
| Operating margin | −41.7% | −51.0% | −34.4% | −21.1% | −19.6% | −12.1% | −26.1% | −3.6% |
| Net margin | −72.0% | −56.3% | −39.6% | −26.6% | −24.3% | −17.1% | −31.3% | −8.3% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | −31.3% | −38.6% | −53.8% | −9.9% | −2.4% | 1.6% | −27.9% | −3.4% |
| Current ratio | 3.16 | 1.86 | 2.44 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 2.02 | 1.67 | 1.88 |
| Debt to equity | 490.4% | 199.1% | 156.1% | 204.6% | 240.1% | 294.1% | 462.1% | 344.6% |
| R&D as % of revenue | 13.0% | 25.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $53m of assets due within a year against $28m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $53m short-term assets against $82m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $19m of cash against $62m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 345% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 41% to 345% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$10m of operating cash flow against $62m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of −$23m against $9m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Neuronetics's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 9 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Cash operating profit has been a median -21.6% of total assets over 8 years.
- Pricing power 12 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 75.2%, moving by 9.9 percentage points (standard deviation) across 9 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -39.8%; its worst year was -57.3%.
- Cash conversion 0 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 0 of 9 years, at a median -39.5% of revenue.
- Discipline 4 / 20
The diluted share count rose 213.5% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 6.9% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Low. In this industry, the business rests on physical assets, regulated networks or products AI itself depends on.
Compare with peers
- Infusystem Holdings, Inc statistics
- Rxsight, Inc. statistics
- Beta Bionics, Inc. statistics
- Lakeland Industries Inc statistics
- Anika Therapeutics, Inc. statistics
Head to head: INFU vs STIMRXST vs STIMBBNX vs STIMLAKE vs STIM
More: Health Care Equipment stocks compared, Health Care sector, rankings of US companies