Latham Group, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Latham Group, Inc. had return on equity of 2.8%, an operating margin of 5.6%, debt equal to 70.2% of equity and a current ratio of 2.77. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2019Dec 2019 | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.9% | 35.4% | 32.4% | 31.1% | 27.0% | 30.2% | 33.4% | 33.4% |
| Operating margin | 7.9% | 9.9% | −5.7% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.6% | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 2.3% | 4.0% | −9.9% | −0.8% | −0.4% | −3.5% | 2.0% | 0.9% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | 8.6% | 11.6% | 1.4% | −1.1% | 14.7% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | 3.8% | 6.7% | −19.6% | −1.5% | −0.6% | −4.5% | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| Return on assets | — | 2.5% | −8.7% | −0.7% | −0.3% | −2.2% | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Asset turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| Current ratio | — | 1.78 | 1.99 | 2.94 | 2.77 | 2.51 | 2.77 | 2.16 |
| Debt to equity | 0.0% | 78.7% | 80.3% | 84.3% | 77.5% | 74.4% | 70.2% | 69.0% |
| Interest cover (operating income ÷ interest) | — | 2.2x | n/m | 1.9x | 0.5x | 0.7x | 1.2x | 1.3x |
| Effective tax rate | — | 29.8% | — | — | — | — | 17.5% | 46.5% |
| SG&A as % of revenue | 18.0% | 21.2% | 34.5% | 21.1% | 19.5% | 21.3% | 22.5% | 23.3% |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | 2.6% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.7% | 5.9% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 5.4% |
| Free cash flow ÷ net income | 368.6% | 293.4% | — | — | — | — | 342.0% | 920.5% |
| Dividends ÷ net income | — | 41.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividends and buybacks ÷ free cash flow | 0.7% | 15.4% | >999% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Quarter | 2024 Q3Sept 2024 | 2024 Q4Dec 2024 | 2025 Q1Mar 2025 | 2025 Q2Jun 2025 | 2025 Q3Sept 2025 | 2025 Q4Dec 2025 | 2026 Q1Mar 2026 | 2026 Q2Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.4% | 24.6% | 29.5% | 37.1% | 35.4% | 28.0% | 31.7% | 35.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | −14.9% | −4.4% | 14.3% | 13.3% | −10.7% | −5.6% | 12.7% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | −33.4% | −5.4% | 9.3% | 5.0% | −7.0% | −7.3% | 6.5% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | 22.1% | −0.1% | −45.2% | 16.8% | 27.9% | 14.1% | −49.6% | 24.3% |
| Current ratio | 2.44 | 2.51 | 2.55 | 2.39 | 2.43 | 2.77 | 1.88 | 2.16 |
| Debt to equity | 67.9% | 72.7% | 80.5% | 70.7% | 68.8% | 69.0% | 70.6% | 68.0% |
| SG&A as % of revenue | 18.8% | 31.2% | 27.5% | 18.5% | 17.7% | 31.4% | 31.2% | 19.1% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $241m of assets due within a year against $112m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $241m short-term assets against $337m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $43m of cash against $280m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 68% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 74% to 68% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt $80m of operating cash flow against $280m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of $29m against $23m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Latham Group's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 6 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Net income has been a median -1.7% of total assets over 6 years.
- Pricing power 11 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 32.6%, moving by 2.9 percentage points (standard deviation) across 6 years.
- Durability 1 / 20
Operating margin has been a median 2.9%; its worst year was 0.3%.
- Cash conversion 12 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 5 of 6 years, at a median 6.9% of revenue.
- Discipline 11 / 20
The diluted share count rose 10.6% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 3.4% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (36 before it).
Compare with peers
- Nwpx Infrastructure, Inc. statistics
- Caesarstone Ltd. statistics
- Janus International Group, Inc. statistics
- Hayward Holdings, Inc. statistics
- Trex Co Inc statistics
Head to head: NWPX vs SWIMCSTE vs SWIMJBI vs SWIM
More: Building Products stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies