undamentalytics Newsletter

Beam Therapeutics vs Macrogenics

Beam Therapeutics and Macrogenics are similar in size: $140m and $150m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Beam Therapeutics grew faster (120.0% against -0.3%). Macrogenics kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -49.9% against -57.2%. Beam Therapeutics carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 0.0%).

Latest fiscal yearBeam TherapeuticsBEAM, 2025MacrogenicsMGNX, 2025
Revenue $140m $150m
Revenue growth 120.0% -0.3%
Net income −$80.0m −$74.6m
Operating margin -274.6% -48.7%
Net margin -57.2% -49.9%
Return on equity -8.1% -86.9%
Free cash flow −$360m −$83.0m
Cash $295m $57.2m
Total debt $0 $0
Debt to equity 0.0% 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees 511 293
Market value $2.74bn $149m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 9 (Weak) 29 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 31 sales 0 buys, 1 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.