undamentalytics Newsletter

Bio-rad Laboratories vs Qiagen

Bio-rad Laboratories is the larger business, with $2.58bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.09bn for Qiagen (1.2 times as much). Qiagen grew faster (5.7% against 0.7%). Bio-rad Laboratories kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 29.4% against 20.3%. Bio-rad Laboratories carries less debt relative to equity (16.2% against 43.8%).

Latest fiscal yearBio-rad LaboratoriesBIO, 2025QiagenQGEN, 2025
Revenue $2.58bn $2.09bn
Revenue growth 0.7% 5.7%
Net income $760m $425m
Operating margin 1.8% 22.3%
Net margin 29.4% 20.3%
Return on equity 10.8% 11.6%
Free cash flow $375m $453m
Cash $530m $839m
Total debt $1.21bn $1.65bn
Debt to equity 16.2% 43.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — 0.5%
Share buybacks $296m $280m
Employees 7,450 —
Market value $10.02bn $11.03bn
Price vs our value range Above our value range Above our value range
Moat score 56 (Moderate) 58 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 2 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.