Ferroglobe vs Sibanye Stillwater
Sibanye Stillwater is the larger business, with $7.26bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.34bn for Ferroglobe (5.4 times as much). Sibanye Stillwater grew faster (18.7% against -18.8%). Sibanye Stillwater kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -4.0% against -12.8%. Ferroglobe carries less debt relative to equity (23.5% against 109.4%).
| Latest fiscal year | FerroglobeGSM, 2025 | Sibanye StillwaterSBSW, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.34bn | $7.26bn |
| Revenue growth | -18.8% | 18.7% |
| Net income | −$171m | −$290m |
| Operating margin | -10.0% | — |
| Net margin | -12.8% | -4.0% |
| Return on equity | -25.9% | -12.3% |
| Free cash flow | −$10.2m | $61.6m |
| Cash | $123m | $1.04bn |
| Total debt | $140m | $2.61bn |
| Debt to equity | 23.5% | 109.4% |
| Dividend per share | — | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | — |
| Share buybacks | $4.7m | — |
| Employees | — | — |
| Market value | $724m | $6.04bn |
| Price vs our value range | Within our value range | — |
| Moat score | — | — |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 2 buys, 1 sales | 8 buys, 0 sales |