undamentalytics Newsletter

Moog vs Woodward

Moog and Woodward are similar in size: $3.86bn and $3.57bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Woodward grew faster (7.3% against 7.0%). Woodward kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 12.4% against 6.1%. Woodward carries less debt relative to equity (27.4% against 47.5%).

Latest fiscal yearMoogMOG.A, 2025WoodwardWWD, 2025
Revenue $3.86bn $3.57bn
Revenue growth 7.0% 7.3%
Net income $235m $442m
Operating margin 11.6% —
Net margin 6.1% 12.4%
Return on equity 12.3% 18.6%
Free cash flow $128m $340m
Cash $62.0m $327m
Total debt $946m $702m
Debt to equity 47.5% 27.4%
Dividend per share $1.15 $1.09
Dividend yield 0.3% 0.4%
Share buybacks $143m $173m
Employees 13,500 —
Market value $11.69bn $20.30bn
Price vs our value range Above our value range Above our value range
Moat score 54 (Moderate) 68 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 18 sales 0 buys, 73 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.