N-able vs Pagerduty
N-able and Pagerduty are similar in size: $509m and $493m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. N-able grew faster (9.3% against 5.4%). Pagerduty kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 35.2% against -3.7%. N-able carries less debt relative to equity (49.9% against 165.9%).
| Latest fiscal year | N-ableNABL, 2025 | PagerdutyPD, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $509m | $493m |
| Revenue growth | 9.3% | 5.4% |
| Net income | −$18.8m | $173m |
| Operating margin | 6.7% | 1.2% |
| Net margin | -3.7% | 35.2% |
| Return on equity | -2.4% | 90.4% |
| Free cash flow | $75.1m | $112m |
| Cash | $112m | $237m |
| Total debt | $400m | $421m |
| Debt to equity | 49.9% | 165.9% |
| Dividend per share | — | — |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Share buybacks | $30.0m | $135m |
| Employees | 1,852 | 1,155 |
| Market value | $956m | $1.41bn |
| Price vs our value range | Above our value range | Above our value range |
| Moat score | 64 (Moderate) | 36 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 0 sales | 0 buys, 9 sales |