undamentalytics Newsletter

Restaurant Brands International vs Yum China Holdings

Yum China Holdings is the larger business, with $11.80bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $9.43bn for Restaurant Brands International (1.3 times as much). Restaurant Brands International grew faster (12.2% against 4.4%). Restaurant Brands International kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 8.2% against 7.9%.

Latest fiscal yearRestaurant Brands InternationalQSR, 2025Yum China HoldingsYUMC, 2025
Revenue $9.43bn $11.80bn
Revenue growth 12.2% 4.4%
Net income $776m $929m
Operating margin 23.3% —
Net margin 8.2% 7.9%
Return on equity 23.0% 16.7%
Free cash flow $1.45bn $840m
Cash $1.16bn $506m
Total debt $13.37bn $30.0m
Debt to equity 368.0% —
Dividend per share $2.48 $0.96
Dividend yield 4.5% 2.3%
Share buybacks $0 $1.14bn
Employees — —
Market value $25.84bn $16.51bn
Price vs our value range — Within our value range
Moat score 81 (Strong) 73 (Strong)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 63 sales 0 buys, 16 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.