undamentalytics Newsletter

Twin Disc vs Xpel

Xpel is the larger business, with $476m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $381m for Twin Disc (1.2 times as much). Xpel grew faster (13.3% against 11.9%). Xpel kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 10.8% against 7.1%. Xpel carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 13.6%).

Latest fiscal yearTwin DiscTWIN, 2026XpelXPEL, 2025
Revenue $381m $476m
Revenue growth 11.9% 13.3%
Net income $27.1m $51.2m
Operating margin 4.7% 13.2%
Net margin 7.1% 10.8%
Return on equity 13.0% 20.3%
Free cash flow $9.2m $62.9m
Cash — $50.9m
Total debt $29.8m $59,000
Debt to equity 13.6% 0.0%
Dividend per share $0.16 —
Dividend yield 0.6% —
Share buybacks — $3.0m
Employees — 1,337
Market value $359m $1.17bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Above our value range
Moat score 25 (Weak) 74 (Strong)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 3 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.