Ampco Pittsburgh vs Twin Disc
Ampco Pittsburgh and Twin Disc are similar in size: $434m and $381m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Twin Disc grew faster (11.9% against 3.8%). Twin Disc kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 7.1% against -15.2%. Twin Disc carries less debt relative to equity (13.6% against 409.4%).
| Latest fiscal year | Ampco PittsburghAP, 2025 | Twin DiscTWIN, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $434m | $381m |
| Revenue growth | 3.8% | 11.9% |
| Net income | −$66.1m | $27.1m |
| Operating margin | -12.5% | 4.7% |
| Net margin | -15.2% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | -144.4% | 13.0% |
| Free cash flow | −$8.1m | $9.2m |
| Cash | $10.7m | — |
| Total debt | $134m | $29.8m |
| Debt to equity | 409.4% | 13.6% |
| Dividend per share | — | $0.16 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.6% |
| Share buybacks | — | — |
| Employees | 1,432 | — |
| Market value | $157m | $359m |
| Price vs our value range | — | Below our value range |
| Moat score | 30 (Weak) | 25 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 7 buys, 2 sales | 0 buys, 3 sales |