Workhorse Group Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Workhorse Group Inc. had a net margin of -302.1%. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2010Dec 2010 | 2011Dec 2011 | 2012Dec 2012 | 2013Dec 2013 | 2014Dec 2014 | 2015Dec 2015 | 2016Dec 2016 | 2017Dec 2017 | 2018Dec 2018 | 2019Dec 2019 | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | −304.9% | −410.6% | <−999% | <−999% | >999% | — | <−999% | −946.3% | −732.4% | −302.1% | −301.5% |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.7% | −140.8% | −82.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Return on assets | −949.8% | <−999% | <−999% | −241.0% | −134.8% | −96.2% | −157.2% | −308.2% | −257.9% | −119.0% | 20.4% | −93.3% | −57.1% | −76.4% | −57.6% | −82.5% | −60.3% |
| Effective tax rate | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D as % of revenue | — | >999% | 763.3% | >999% | >999% | >999% | 95.8% | 176.7% | 968.5% | >999% | 657.0% | — | 462.1% | 186.9% | 183.0% | 62.1% | 81.5% |
| SG&A as % of revenue | — | — | — | >999% | >999% | >999% | 96.7% | 87.9% | >999% | >999% | >999% | — | >999% | 424.4% | 227.8% | 116.6% | 129.3% |
| Quarter | 2024 Q3Sept 2024 | 2024 Q4Dec 2024 | 2025 Q1Mar 2025 | 2025 Q2Jun 2025 | 2025 Q3Sept 2025 | 2025 Q4Dec 2025 | 2026 Q1Mar 2026 | 2026 Q2Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | <−999% | >999% | <−999% | <−999% | −328.2% | −166.5% | −459.3% | −566.3% |
| R&D as % of revenue | 92.2% | 215.0% | 319.7% | 426.3% | 45.2% | 74.4% | 94.0% | 115.3% |
| SG&A as % of revenue | 307.7% | −758.2% | 379.0% | 595.9% | 325.8% | 34.5% | 220.5% | 220.1% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $56m of assets due within a year against $44m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $56m short-term assets against $59m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $10m of cash against $54m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 755% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Five-year comparison not available. Not assessable.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$54m of operating cash flow against $54m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Interest not separately reported. Not assessable.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Workhorse Group's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 9 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Cash operating profit has been a median -52.4% of total assets over 9 years.
- Pricing power 0 / 20
Gross margin has been a median -230.8%, moving by 1371.1 percentage points (standard deviation) across 10 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -1166.4%; its worst year was -16653.5%.
- Cash conversion 1 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 1 of 10 years, at a median -1109.5% of revenue.
- Discipline 0 / 20
The diluted share count rose 1554.1% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 74.2% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (11 before it).
Compare with peers
- Ezgo Technologies Ltd. statistics
- Fly-e Group, Inc. statistics
- Xos, Inc. statistics
- Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. statistics
- Gogoro Inc. statistics
Head to head: EZGO vs WKHSFLYE vs WKHSWKHS vs XOS
More: Automobile Manufacturers stocks compared, Consumer Discretionary sector, rankings of US companies