undamentalytics Newsletter

China Automotive Systems vs Stoneridge

China Automotive Systems and Stoneridge are similar in size: $766m and $861m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. China Automotive Systems grew faster (17.6% against -5.2%). China Automotive Systems kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 5.6% against -11.9%.

Latest fiscal yearChina Automotive SystemsCAAS, 2025StoneridgeSRI, 2025
Revenue $766m $861m
Revenue growth 17.6% -5.2%
Net income $42.8m −$103m
Operating margin 7.0% —
Net margin 5.6% -11.9%
Return on equity 11.4% -48.4%
Free cash flow $74.4m $12.2m
Cash $142m $53.1m
Total debt $87.0m $181m
Debt to equity 21.7% —
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — 4,200
Market value $127m $164m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — 38 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 4 buys, 1 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.