undamentalytics Newsletter

Logprostyle vs Matthews International

Matthews International is the larger business, with $1.50bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $148m for Logprostyle (10.1 times as much). Logprostyle grew faster (8.9% against -16.6%). Logprostyle kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 3.4% against -1.6%. Matthews International carries less debt relative to equity (147.8% against 406.8%).

Latest fiscal yearLogprostyleLGPS, 2026Matthews InternationalMATW, 2025
Revenue $148m $1.50bn
Revenue growth 8.9% -16.6%
Net income $5.1m −$24.5m
Operating margin 7.1% 5.0%
Net margin 3.4% -1.6%
Return on equity 20.2% -5.3%
Free cash flow −$25.5m −$59.4m
Cash $14.3m $32.4m
Total debt $108m $711m
Debt to equity 406.8% 147.8%
Dividend per share — $1.00
Dividend yield — 5.4%
Share buybacks — $12.2m
Employees — 5,500
Market value $14.8m $617m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — 33 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 7 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.