Matthews International vs 3M
3M is the larger business, with $24.95bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.50bn for Matthews International (16.7 times as much). 3M grew faster (1.5% against -16.6%). 3M kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 13.0% against -1.6%. Matthews International carries less debt relative to equity (147.8% against 268.0%).
| Latest fiscal year | Matthews InternationalMATW, 2025 | 3MMMM, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.50bn | $24.95bn |
| Revenue growth | -16.6% | 1.5% |
| Net income | −$24.5m | $3.25bn |
| Operating margin | 5.0% | 18.6% |
| Net margin | -1.6% | 13.0% |
| Return on equity | -5.3% | 76.1% |
| Free cash flow | −$59.4m | $1.40bn |
| Cash | $32.4m | $5.24bn |
| Total debt | $711m | $12.60bn |
| Debt to equity | 147.8% | 268.0% |
| Dividend per share | $1.00 | $2.92 |
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | 1.7% |
| Share buybacks | $12.2m | $3.25bn |
| Employees | 5,500 | 60,500 |
| Market value | $617m | $91.29bn |
| Price vs our value range | — | Above our value range |
| Moat score | 33 (Weak) | 72 (Strong) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 7 buys, 0 sales | 0 buys, 59 sales |