Lamb Weston Holdings vs McCormick &
Lamb Weston Holdings and McCormick & are similar in size: $6.61bn and $6.84bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Lamb Weston Holdings grew faster (2.5% against 1.7%). McCormick & kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 11.5% against 4.4%. McCormick & carries less debt relative to equity (69.7% against 215.3%).
| Latest fiscal year | Lamb Weston HoldingsLW, 2026 | McCormick &MKC, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.61bn | $6.84bn |
| Revenue growth | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Net income | $290m | $789m |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | 15.7% |
| Net margin | 4.4% | 11.5% |
| Return on equity | 16.3% | 14.3% |
| Free cash flow | $540m | $740m |
| Cash | $68.2m | $95.9m |
| Total debt | $3.93bn | $4.00bn |
| Debt to equity | 215.3% | 69.7% |
| Dividend per share | $1.50 | $1.83 |
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.9% |
| Share buybacks | — | $34.8m |
| Employees | 10,000 | 14,100 |
| Market value | $7.61bn | $12.91bn |
| Price vs our value range | — | Within our value range |
| Moat score | 71 (Strong) | 68 (Moderate) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 10 buys, 0 sales | 3 buys, 10 sales |