Red Cat Holdings, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. had return on equity of -49.8% and a net margin of -177.0%. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2010Dec 2010 | 2011Dec 2011 | 2012Dec 2012 | 2013Dec 2013 | 2014Dec 2014 | 2015Dec 2015 | 2016Dec 2016 | 2017Dec 2017 | 2018Dec 2018 | 2020Apr 2020 | 2021Apr 2021 | 2022Apr 2022 | 2023Apr 2023 | 2024Apr 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | −926.0% | <−999% | >999% | >999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | >999% | <−999% | −396.6% | −264.7% | −181.8% | −608.3% | −134.9% | −177.0% | −136.3% |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | 79.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −191.7% | — | −27.7% | −42.0% | −48.9% | −49.8% | −27.2% |
| Return on assets | −81.4% | −137.3% | 664.1% | 60.1% | −782.7% | −416.7% | −948.0% | 169.3% | −550.0% | −106.1% | −182.5% | −24.2% | −38.5% | −44.0% | −44.7% | −24.3% |
| R&D as % of revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | 422.6% | >999% | — | 121.1% | 10.3% | 40.5% | 126.8% | 35.1% | 43.9% | 46.2% |
| SG&A as % of revenue | — | 707.6% | >999% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quarter | 2024 Q2Jul 2024 | 2024 Q3Oct 2024 | 2025 Q1Mar 2025 | 2025 Q2Jun 2025 | 2025 Q3Sept 2025 | 2025 Q4Dec 2025 | 2026 Q1Mar 2026 | 2026 Q2Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | −447.2% | −868.9% | <−999% | −412.6% | −166.0% | −74.9% | −171.6% | −174.6% |
| R&D as % of revenue | 58.6% | 145.4% | 210.7% | 111.8% | 61.9% | 18.6% | 51.5% | 70.4% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $425m of assets due within a year against $29m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $425m short-term assets against $28m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt Cash or debt not separately reported. Not assessable.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 0% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 2% to 0% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$139m of operating cash flow against $2m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Interest not separately reported. Not assessable.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Red Cat Holdings's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 6 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Net income has been a median -282.1% of total assets over 6 years.
- Pricing power 0 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 9.7%, moving by 126.3 percentage points (standard deviation) across 5 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -402.4%; its worst year was -904.6%.
AI disruption exposure: Low. In this industry, the business rests on physical assets, regulated networks or products AI itself depends on.
Compare with peers
- CPI Aerostructures Inc statistics
- Park Aerospace Corp statistics
- XTI Aerospace, Inc. statistics
- Spire Global, Inc. statistics
- Ehang Holdings Ltd statistics
Head to head: CVU vs RCATPKE vs RCATRCAT vs XTIA
More: Aerospace & Defense stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies