undamentalytics Newsletter

Gorman Rupp vs Trimas

Gorman Rupp and Trimas are similar in size: $682m and $646m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Gorman Rupp grew faster (3.4% against 2.4%). Trimas kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 18.6% against 7.8%. Trimas carries less debt relative to equity (67.0% against 74.9%).

Latest fiscal yearGorman RuppGRC, 2025TrimasTRS, 2025
Revenue $682m $646m
Revenue growth 3.4% 2.4%
Net income $53.0m $120m
Operating margin 14.0% 6.4%
Net margin 7.8% 18.6%
Return on equity 13.4% 17.5%
Free cash flow $88.9m $69.1m
Cash $35.1m $30.0m
Total debt $311m $473m
Debt to equity 74.9% 67.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.4%
Share buybacks $1.2m $103m
Employees — 3,700
Market value $1.98bn $1.42bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Within our value range
Moat score 67 (Moderate) 50 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 1 sales 5 buys, 3 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.