Snap-on vs Timken
Snap-on and Timken are similar in size: $5.16bn and $4.58bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Snap-on grew faster (0.9% against 0.2%). Snap-on kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 19.7% against 6.3%.
| Latest fiscal year | Snap-onSNA, 2025 | TimkenTKR, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.16bn | $4.58bn |
| Revenue growth | 0.9% | 0.2% |
| Net income | $1.02bn | $288m |
| Operating margin | 25.8% | — |
| Net margin | 19.7% | 6.3% |
| Return on equity | 18.0% | 9.6% |
| Free cash flow | $1.01bn | $406m |
| Cash | $1.62bn | $364m |
| Total debt | $1.22bn | $1.92bn |
| Debt to equity | 20.5% | — |
| Dividend per share | $8.86 | $1.39 |
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| Share buybacks | $329m | $57.4m |
| Employees | 13,000 | 19,000 |
| Market value | $18.94bn | $8.11bn |
| Price vs our value range | Within our value range | Above our value range |
| Moat score | 92 (Strong) | 69 (Moderate) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 71 sales | 0 buys, 12 sales |