Under Armour, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2026, Under Armour, Inc. had return on equity of -30.0% and a net margin of -10.0%. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2010Dec 2009 | 2011Dec 2010 | 2012Dec 2011 | 2013Dec 2012 | 2014Dec 2013 | 2015Dec 2014 | 2016Dec 2015 | 2017Dec 2016 | 2018Dec 2017 | 2019Dec 2018 | 2020Dec 2019 | 2021Dec 2020 | 2022Dec 2021 | 2023Mar 2023 | 2024Mar 2024 | 2025Mar 2025 | 2026Mar 2026 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 5.7% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 5.3% | −1.0% | −0.9% | 1.7% | −12.3% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 4.1% | −3.9% | −10.0% | −10.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.7% | 15.3% | 17.1% | 17.7% | 17.4% | 17.3% | 15.4% | 13.9% | −2.4% | −2.3% | 4.4% | −28.8% | 18.8% | 18.5% | 11.3% | −10.0% | −30.0% | −34.7% |
| Return on assets | 8.6% | 11.2% | 12.2% | 12.4% | 11.9% | 11.3% | 9.4% | 7.9% | −1.3% | −1.1% | 2.0% | −11.1% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 4.8% | −4.4% | −11.4% | −11.6% |
| Effective tax rate | 43.2% | 37.1% | 38.2% | 36.7% | 37.8% | 39.2% | 39.9% | 33.8% | — | — | 33.4% | — | 7.9% | −40.6% | 11.4% | — | — | — |
| SG&A as % of revenue | 39.5% | 40.8% | 41.5% | 40.6% | 41.9% | 38.6% | 37.8% | 37.9% | 42.1% | 42.0% | 42.4% | 48.5% | 41.3% | 40.3% | 42.1% | 50.4% | 46.2% | 46.8% |
| Dividends ÷ net income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $2.4bn of assets due within a year against $1.3bn of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $2.4bn short-term assets against $1.4bn of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $396m of cash against $591m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 41% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 32% to 41% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$15m of operating cash flow against $591m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of −$120m against $62m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Under Armour's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 10 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 2 / 20
Cash operating profit has been a median 3.1% of total assets over 10 years.
- Pricing power 16 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 46.6%, moving by 1.5 percentage points (standard deviation) across 10 years.
- Durability 0 / 20
Operating margin has been a median 2.3%; its worst year was -11.4%.
- Cash conversion 7 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 6 of 10 years, at a median 2.9% of revenue.
- Discipline 19 / 20
The diluted share count fell 6.2% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 0.8% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (44 before it).
Compare with peers
- Levi Strauss & Co statistics
- Gildan Activewear Inc. statistics
- Columbia Sportswear Co statistics
- Capri Holdings Ltd statistics
- Tapestry, Inc. statistics
Head to head: LEVI vs UAAGIL vs UAACOLM vs UAA
More: Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods stocks compared, Consumer Discretionary sector, rankings of US companies