undamentalytics Newsletter

Repay Holdings vs Sezzle

Sezzle is the larger business, with $450m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $309m for Repay Holdings (1.5 times as much). Sezzle grew faster (66.1% against -1.2%). Sezzle kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 29.6% against -83.0%. Sezzle carries less debt relative to equity (82.4% against 89.6%).

Latest fiscal yearRepay HoldingsRPAY, 2025SezzleSEZL, 2025
Revenue $309m $450m
Revenue growth -1.2% 66.1%
Net income −$257m $133m
Operating margin -82.4% 39.3%
Net margin -83.0% 29.6%
Return on equity -41.2% 103.3%
Free cash flow $90.8m $209m
Cash $116m $64.1m
Total debt $434m $140m
Debt to equity 89.6% 82.4%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — $64.7m
Employees 486 201
Market value $382m $4.19bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Below our value range
Moat score 45 (Moderate) 52 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 16 buys, 6 sales 3 buys, 94 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.